ಮೋದಿ ‘ಎನ್‌ಕೌಂಟರ್’ಗೆ ಹೊರಟವರು ಈಗೇನು ಹೇಳುತ್ತಾರೆ?

15 Responses to “ಮೋದಿ ‘ಎನ್‌ಕೌಂಟರ್’ಗೆ ಹೊರಟವರು ಈಗೇನು ಹೇಳುತ್ತಾರೆ?”

1. BASAVARAJ TALLIHAL says:

   July 12, 2010 at 10:08 AM

   ALL THESE CONGRESSMENS AND SECULAR JOURNALISTS ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS. CONGRESS PARTY AND CONGRESS LEADERS ARE DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY AND OUR RELIGION FROM BEFORE INDEPENDENCE.NOW SECULAR MEDIA DOING THAT JOB WITH THESE PEOPLE

2. sunaath says:

   July 13, 2010 at 5:29 AM

   ಭಯೋತ್ಪಾದನೆ ಎನ್ನುವ ಈ ಭಸ್ಮಾಸುರ ಭಾರತವನ್ನೇ ಸುಟ್ಟುಹಾಕುತ್ತಿದ್ದರೆ, ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ ನಾಯಕರು secularismದ ಪಿಟೀಲು ಬಾರಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಇವರೂ ಸಹ ಇಂದಿಲ್ಲ ನಾಳೆ ಇದೇ ಬೆಂಕಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸುಡುವದು ಖಂಡಿತ.

3. Murali says:

   July 14, 2010 at 9:19 AM

   As usual good… see what will be mental status of Police men who served for country. In this case police who done good job was suffered moral defeat by this ‘Sick’ularist

4. Karthik says:

   July 14, 2010 at 10:25 AM

   well said Pratap. I agree with you; however after mining row in Karnataka (in fact after reading your article on Justice Santosh Hegde), my vote to BJP is only if Jaitely or Modi are PM candidates; not even if it is Sushma.

5. veenus says:

   July 14, 2010 at 11:40 AM

   true !!! very true

   ishrat was with terrorist but her mother tried to defend her..
   its like “hettavarige heggana muddu”
   but when it comes to our country, she dont have to react like that.
   any ways … afterall truth remains truth..

   and now this congress people,,,,,,, we never expect them to take high decision against terrorist….

   its all for vote banking

   one side they says that all muslims are not terrorist

   and another side whenever there is need of taking high decisions against terrorists.. these congress people hegitate..
   they afraid of loosing muslims votes
   if all others of that community are good people then there is no matter of loosing vote by punishing terrorists

   or else these cunning people themselve dont want to solve this terrorist’s issue????
   “agar log marte hai to marne do… aur acha publicity milega sympathy dikha ne ke naam pe”
   YUKS,,,,,,,,,,,
   SHAME ON THEM

   what else proof want to show that congress is in favor of only n only one community..
   ????
   aur wo sonia gandhi– khud to theek tarah se hindu nahi hai aur chali hai indian parliment rule karne ke liye
   us se hum expect bhi nahi kar sakte ki wo kabhi hindus ko support karegi

   jaane kya hoga hamara INDIA ka

6. deepak bharadwaj says:

   July 15, 2010 at 2:23 AM

   sir,
   a splended article. hats off to ur courage.
   abhishek manu singhvi,cong spokesperson called our karnataka as “GOONDARAJ”. as a proud kannadiga i can’t withstand these type of comments. although k’taka is in bad rule due to reddys & shriramulu the state cannot be called as goondaraj as that idiot said. so please write an article abt this.

7. rajeev says:

   July 15, 2010 at 3:33 AM

   well said Mr PratapSimha. its our own people who spoil everything, right from the politicians, journalists, judiciary among others. we as a country have no focus/common goals. Just imagine, people from outside come to Mumbai, destroy so easily and die after taking so many lives. What do we do? We want Pakistan to act, bring the culprits to justice….ha ha so funny. Likewise naxalites kill in hundreds, and we are more worried about their likes and dislikes, What makes them do like this? they are such nice people but kill when angry……Sad.

8. Prashanth Somanna says:

   July 16, 2010 at 8:45 AM

   Hi Pratap,

   This seems a strange, I feel narendra modi is a good politician. But english media cheated modi by badly imaging his personality & there is no punishment for media mistakes.

   What you have revealed in the article is real truth only.

9. Ravindra Prabhu says:

   July 22, 2010 at 5:18 AM

   “Secular terrorism” ಪದ ಪ್ರಯೋಗ ತುಂಬಾ ಸರಿಯಾಗಿದೆ.

10. venkatesha D.L. says:

    July 22, 2010 at 5:41 AM

    ಪ್ರತಾಪಸಿಂಹರವರೇ,
    ನಾನು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಅಭಿಮಾನಿಯಲ್ಲ, ನಿಮ್ಮ ಲೇಖನಗಳಲ್ಲಿನ ನಿಷ್ಪಕ್ಷಪಾತತೆಯ, ವಸ್ತುನಿಷ್ಠ ದೃಷ್ಟಿಕೋನದ ಅಭಿಮಾನಿ. ನೀವು ಬರೆಯುವ ಲೇಖನಗಳು ಯಾವಾಗಲೂ ಅರ್ಥಪೂರ್ಣವಾಗಿರುತ್ತವೆ ಮಾತ್ರವಲ್ಲ, ಓದುಗನನ್ನು ತಲುಪಬೇಕು ಎನ್ನುವ ಏಕೈಕ ಗುರಿಯನ್ನು ಹೊಂದಿರುತ್ತವೆ. ಅಷ್ಟೇ ಅಲ್ಲ, ಓದುಗನ ಅನುಭವದ ಒಂದು ಅವಿಭಾಜ್ಯ ಅಂಗವಾಗಿ ಮಾರ್ಪಟ್ಟು, ವಾಸ್ತವ ಜಗತ್ತಿನಲ್ಲಿ ದೈನಂದಿನವಾಗಿ ಬಳಸಲ್ಪಡಬಹುದಾದ ತಿಳುವಳಿಕೆಯ ಅಂಶಗಳಾಗಿ ಮಾರ್ಪಡುತ್ತವೆ ಮತ್ತು ಯಾವ ಕಾರಣಕ್ಕೂ ಮರೆತು ಹೋಗುವುದಿಲ್ಲ. ಈ ಮಾತನ್ನು ನಾನು ಓದಿದ ಸಾವಿರಾರು ಲೇಖನಗಳೊಡನೆ ತುಲನೆ ಮಾಡಿ ಹೇಳುತ್ತಿದ್ದೇನೆ. ನಾನು ಓದಿದ ಬಹುತೇಕ ಲೇಖನಗಳು (ನಿಮ್ಮದಲ್ಲ) ಓದುಗನಿಗೆ ಅರ್ಥವಾಗಬಾರದು, ಅವನಲ್ಲಿ ಗೊಂದಲ ಉಂಟಾಗಲಿ, ಅವನ ತಿಳುವಳಿಕೆಯ ಮಟ್ಟ ಕುಸಿಯಲಿ ಎಂದೇ ಯಾವುದೋ ಜ್ಞಾನದ್ರೋಹಾತ್ಮಕ ಉದ್ದೇಶವನ್ನಿಟ್ಟುಕೊಂಡು ಬರೆಯಲ್ಪಟ್ಟಿದ್ದವುಗಳು. ಈ ಹಿನ್ನೆಲೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ನಾನು ನಿಮ್ಮಲ್ಲಿ ಮಾಡಿಕೊಳ್ಳುವ ಮನವಿ ಏನೆಂದರೆ ದಯವಿಟ್ಟು ಯಾವುದೇ ಕಾರಣಕ್ಕೂ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಈ ಲೇಖನಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಇರುವ ವಸ್ತುನಿಷ್ಠತೆಯನ್ನು ಉಳಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಿ, ರಾಜಿ ಆಗಬೇಡಿ.
    Really hats off!
    ಪ್ರೀತಿಯ,
    ವೆಂಕಟೇಶ. ಡಿ.ಎಲ್.

11. Pratheeksha says:

    July 25, 2010 at 7:21 AM

    dont u worry about Modi’s life Mr.Pratap…..PAAPI is CHIRAYU…so no need of being worried about that dumb ass.

12. THOMAS says:

    July 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM

    THE UGLY AND HIDDEN SIDE OF NEHRU FAMILY

    *GHIYASUDDIN GHAZI (Name changed to GANGA DHAR to
    escape British army). His son was
    MOTI LAL NEHRU

    ___________________________________________

    * MOTILAL married and his first wife and son died
    at childbirth.

    * MOTILAL and his second wife THUSSU (name changed
    to SWAROOP RANI) had three children.

    * THUSSU with MOBARAK ALI (Motilal’s Boss) was the
    first son JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU (he was circumcised).

    * MOTILAL AND THUSSU had two daughters by name NAN
    (also called Vijaya Lakshmi) & KRISHNA
    MOTILAL had also two bastard sons out of Muslim
    women by name SHEIK ABDULLA & SYED HUSSAIN

    __________________________________________________

    * VIJAYA LAKSHMI eloped with SYED HUSSAIN (half
    brother and sister) and had a girl CHANDRALEKHA

    * VIJAYALAKSHMI MARRIED R.S. PANDIT and had two
    more girls NAYANTARA & RITA

    * JAWAHARLAL NEHRU married KAMALA KAUL (marriage
    never consummated)

    * JAWAHARLAL had an affair with SHRADDHA MATA
    (assumed name) and had a son given away to an
    orphanage in BANGALORE

    * JAWAHARLAL had an affair with LADY MOUNTBATTEN
    but no children.

    * JAWAHARLAL HAD MANY AFFAIRS and in the end died
    of SYPHILIS

    * KAMALA KAUL had an affair with MANZUR ALI (who is
    son of Mobarak Ali who fathered Nehru also) and
    their daughter is INDIRA PRIYADARSINI NEHRU

    * KAMALA KAUL had an affair with FEROZ KHAN (son of
    Nawab Khan who supplied liquor to their house)
    but no children

    *INDIRA was found in the bed with her GERMAN
    TEACHER at Shantiniketan

    *INDIRA PRIYADARSINI nikhahed as per Islamic rites
    FEROZ KHAN after converting herself to Islam. Her
    new name was MAIMUNA BEGUM and both had changed
    their name to fool the public of India on the
    advice of Gandhiji by an affidavit in a court to
    INDIRA GANDHI and FEROZ GANDHI

    *INDIRA and FEROZ had one son by name RAJIV GANDHI
    (as per Islamic rites he was circumcised)

    *INDIRA had an affair with MOHAMMED YOUNUS and had
    a second son SANJIV GANDHI (later the name
    changed to SANJAY GANDHI to escape prosecution in
    UK for car theft. He was circumcised as per
    Islamic rites)

    *FEROZ had an affair with MEHMUNA SULTANA
    _______________________________________________

    *RAJIV GANDHI converted to a Christian Catholic
    and changed the name to ROBERTO and married the
    Italian Catholic Christian by name SONIA MAINO

    ****(Sonia Maino was on the pay roll of KGB, the
    Russian spy agency which presented her in front
    of Rajiv Gandhi)*** and had one daughter and one son
    by name BIANKA and RAUL. For the Indian public
    these names are presented as PRIYANKA and RAHUL.

    ________________________________________
    INTERESTING HISTORY!

    At the very beginning of his book, “The Nehru Dynasty”, astrologer K.N.Rao mentions the names of Jawaharlal’s father and grandfather.
    Jawahar Lal’s father was believed to be Motilal and Motilal’s father was one Gangadhar Nehru.
    And we all know that Jawaharlal’s only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis.
    She was totally against Indira’s proposed marriage with Feroze.
    Why? No one tells us that!

    Now, who is this Feroze?
    We are told by many that he was the son of the family grocer.
    The grocer supplied wines,etc. to Anand Bhavan (previously known as Ishrat Manzil)

    What was the family grocer’s name?
    One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi’s grandfather was Pandit Nehru.
    But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal grandfathers.
    In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies.

    Why is it then, no where, we find Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal grandfather’s name?
    It appears that the reason is simply this. Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat.
    This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam.
    This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived.
    Rajiv’s father Feroze, was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru’s wishes.

    Feroze’s mother’s family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi,sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an affidavit.

    The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the ShantiniketanUniversity by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by herself,
    while father Jawahar was busy with politics, pretty women and illicit sex;
    the mother was in hospital.
    Feroze Khan, the grocer’s son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque.

    Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (better known as Mahatma Gandhi).
    Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance.
    It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi.

    The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India’s Mahatma and the ‘Father of the Nation’ didn’t mention this game of his in the famous book, ‘My Experiments with Truth’. Why?

    When they returned to India, a mock ‘Vedic marriage’ was instituted for public consumption.
    On this subject,writes M.O. Mathai (a longtime Private Secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI! ) ‘Reminiscences of the Nehru Age’ on page94, second paragraph: “For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage.”

    It’s a known fact that after Rajiv’s birth Indira and Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced.

    Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru’s political activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister’s residence Trimurthi Bhavan.
    Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political forces, is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry.

    Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions and deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of Indira (or Mrs.Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze.
    He was the son of another Muslim gentleman, Mohammad Yunus.

    Here, in passing, we might mention that the second son was originally named Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother’s name.
    It was changed to Sanjay when he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car.
    Krishna Menon was then India’s High Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay.

    Incidentally, Sanjay’s marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka(now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of mythological Lord Indra’s Court dancer rather offensive !!) took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus’s house in New Delhi.

    And the marriage with Menaka who was a model (She had model for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel)was not so ordinary either.
    Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay.

    It was then that her father,Colonel Anand, threatened Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry her daughter. And that did the trick.
    Sanjay married Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka.
    Apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice.

    It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident.

    Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards.

    At least one case is very graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his “Reminiscences of the NehruAge”, page 206.

    Mathai writes:
    “In the autumn of 1948 a young woman from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology. People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses. One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru’s old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM’s house. As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, shapely and beautiful. Meetings of Nehru with her became rather frequent, mostly after he finished his work at night. During one of Nehru’s visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply and she visited Nehru at midnight…“

    Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared.

    In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself.

    She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left the child behind.

    She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, who was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was told they were from the Prime Minister.

    The person who brought the letters surrendered them…”I (Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his hereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely tightlipped and secretive.

    Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was.”

    Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi,
    we all know now that he changed his so called Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy.

    Rajiv became Roberto.
    His daughter’s name is Bianca and son’s name is Raul.

    Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul.

    What is amazing is the extent of our people’s ignorance in such matters.

    The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as Prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi.

    Mind you, speaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all.
    His grandmother (father’s mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan.

    It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven.
    The children’s encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in the world today!

    The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University Rajiv had not passed a single exam. He had therefore to leave Cambridge without a certificate.

    Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right, but not of the University of Cambridge , but of one of those fly by night language schools where foreign students come to learn English. Sonia was working as an ‘au pair’ girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the same time.

    And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of India’s public.

    This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now a foreigner leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification being married into the Nehru family.
    Maneka Gandhi, though Indian, herself is being accepted by the non-Congress parties not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but for her links to the Nehru family.

    Saying that an Italian (or any foreigner) should not lead India will amount to narrow mindedness, but if Sania Maino (now Sonia) had served India like, say, Mother Teresa or Annie Besant, i.e. in anyway on her own rights, then all Indians should be proud of her just as how proud we are of Mother Teresa.
    .

    The point is Indians who nominate the people to stand in these elections; and the people who vote their rulers (i.e. the authorities) must know that truth eventually come out some day.

    Dont allow the famous land of India (our motherland) to be looked down by others.

    Read more: http://www.unp.co.in/f81/the-ugly-side-of-nehru-gandhi-family-11920/#ixzz0mO4JqcVy

13. AMAR DEVDHAR says:

    August 3, 2010 at 7:59 AM

    Dear Pratap,

    I like your articles and your style of expressing your thoughts! Your strong unbiased, out of the box views on every political topic commendable and appreciable!

    BUT, looking at the current status and the TURNING POINT of the SOHRABUDDIN MURDER CASE, what are your views now???? Do you still want us to rely and believe the People like Mr. Modi?

    When all the national channels of the country are waging a war of words using this case, I want to know how one can defend Modi??? Because even if he has his hands in this case, I LIKE MODI AS A LEADER who is fit for our country:) So, that is why writing this opinion so late!!!

14. Toyota Tundra says:

    August 6, 2010 at 9:39 PM

    My friend and I were arguing about this! Now I know that I was right. lol! Thanks for making me sure!

15. THOMAS says:

    September 17, 2010 at 11:38 AM

    INDIA’S NUMBER 1 CHIEF MINISTER IS OUR NEXT PRIME MINISTER