Comments on: ಆಕ್ಸ್‌ಫರ್ಡ್‌ನ ಅರ್ಥಶಾಸ್ತ್ರಜ್ಞರೇ ಚರ್ಚೆಗೆ ಅಂಜಿದೊಡೆಂತಯ್ಯ? http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/ Columnist, Writer & Journalist Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:56:08 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Deepak http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/comment-page-2/#comment-5722 Deepak Sun, 18 Apr 2010 05:20:23 +0000 http://pratapsimha.com/?p=118#comment-5722 its not a good artical its not a good artical

]]> By: savitha http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/comment-page-2/#comment-2087 savitha Mon, 04 May 2009 12:57:23 +0000 http://pratapsimha.com/?p=118#comment-2087 i just wanna share my opinion.. Mr M prasad may also consider this as a reply for his "senseful" comments. Each and everything has two faces. Good and bad and it depends upon the person's view towards it. Wat pratap has said is in the view of a true citizen of the nation and not as a weed of BJP. In the begining of the article itself he has mentioned the qualifications of our PM. Any person with these many qualifications will certainly call for a healthy debate. Its unfortunate that our PM has not lended his hand for such debate. When someone dare to do that, atleast he could have agreed for that. Wats pulling him back and wats the reason for his denial to the invi sent by advaniji for the "debate"? Wat do we consider this action of our PM? If u speak abt the achievements, wat has congress done so for being in the power for more than four decades? Is the time is not sufficient? Being an IT professional dont u even know know newspaper is one of the powerful media which reaches the mass than the campaigns? if you r really interested, y dont u start a new campaign against all political dramas? A good journalist will always keep alarming the people as wats going around and works for the social welfare. thats wat Mr pratap has been doing. i just wanna share my opinion.. Mr M prasad may also consider this as a reply for his “senseful” comments. Each and everything has two faces. Good and bad and it depends upon the person’s view towards it. Wat pratap has said is in the view of a true citizen of the nation and not as a weed of BJP. In the begining of the article itself he has mentioned the qualifications of our PM. Any person with these many qualifications will certainly call for a healthy debate. Its unfortunate that our PM has not lended his hand for such debate. When someone dare to do that, atleast he could have agreed for that. Wats pulling him back and wats the reason for his denial to the invi sent by advaniji for the “debate”? Wat do we consider this action of our PM? If u speak abt the achievements, wat has congress done so for being in the power for more than four decades? Is the time is not sufficient? Being an IT professional dont u even know know newspaper is one of the powerful media which reaches the mass than the campaigns? if you r really interested, y dont u start a new campaign against all political dramas? A good journalist will always keep alarming the people as wats going around and works for the social welfare. thats wat Mr pratap has been doing.

]]> By: Sindhoo http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/comment-page-2/#comment-1940 Sindhoo Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:28:02 +0000 http://pratapsimha.com/?p=118#comment-1940 I read all the comments. Huh! There are so many people who would simply agree whatever u say. I have read comments for the other articles too. Once someone becomes your fan, he/she will start agreeing with u....like.....brainwash (take it positively, i don't have a better word). This is a quality of a leader. Well... be careful too. give impartial opinions. Because your words matter so much. I read all the comments. Huh! There are so many people who would simply agree whatever u say. I have read comments for the other articles too. Once someone becomes your fan, he/she will start agreeing with u….like…..brainwash (take it positively, i don’t have a better word). This is a quality of a leader. Well… be careful too. give impartial opinions. Because your words matter so much.

]]> By: Madhusoodan G http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/comment-page-2/#comment-1933 Madhusoodan G Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:43:00 +0000 http://pratapsimha.com/?p=118#comment-1933 In my opinion, young blood should come up in the political activities and do some better work than these old people. I do respect there ideas and hard work done towards the nation, they should retire at right age so that more people can work under there guidence. But They never change there mindset towrds our population as vote banks in terms of castes. In my opinion, young blood should come up in the political activities and do some better work than these old people. I do respect there ideas and hard work done towards the nation, they should retire at right age so that more people can work under there guidence. But They never change there mindset towrds our population as vote banks in terms of castes.

]]> By: Anand http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/comment-page-2/#comment-1930 Anand Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:00:42 +0000 http://pratapsimha.com/?p=118#comment-1930 You fool Gururaj first read the article properly and then commit. You fool Gururaj first read the article properly and then commit.

]]> By: Reddi http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/comment-page-2/#comment-1929 Reddi Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:55:48 +0000 http://pratapsimha.com/?p=118#comment-1929 This M Prasad is mad fellow don't give importance to him. This M Prasad is mad fellow don’t give importance to him.

]]> By: girish bhat http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/comment-page-2/#comment-1923 girish bhat Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:32:36 +0000 http://pratapsimha.com/?p=118#comment-1923 Fantastic article !! Fantastic article !!

]]> By: Callmebiased http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/comment-page-1/#comment-1913 Callmebiased Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:05:03 +0000 http://pratapsimha.com/?p=118#comment-1913 Dr. Manmohan Singh need justify nothing. His credentials and phenomenal success as an academician and then on in offices of high relevance have time and again shown what he is capable of. Dirty electoral politics are not his thing. I am saddened deeply by mudslinging from his own end. As a fellow doctorate student in Oxford, it pains me no end. Also Pratap, Singh did his masters in Economics from Cambridge,and went on to get a D Phil in Economics from Oxford, in Nuffield College - the place for Economics and Political Science. He continues to be an honorary fellow there, alongside greats like Amartya Sen, Ariel Rubisntein, James Mirrlees. Dr. Manmohan Singh need justify nothing. His credentials and phenomenal success as an academician and then on in offices of high relevance have time and again shown what he is capable of. Dirty electoral politics are not his thing. I am saddened deeply by mudslinging from his own end. As a fellow doctorate student in Oxford, it pains me no end.

Also Pratap, Singh did his masters in Economics from Cambridge,and went on to get a D Phil in Economics from Oxford, in Nuffield College – the place for Economics and Political Science. He continues to be an honorary fellow there, alongside greats like Amartya Sen, Ariel Rubisntein, James Mirrlees.

]]> By: Shivakumar http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/comment-page-1/#comment-1909 Shivakumar Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:54:18 +0000 http://pratapsimha.com/?p=118#comment-1909 Hi Pratap, Good aritcal. One should think about MM Singh and LK Advani before voting. Everyone knows that, though MM Singh is brilliant and has good personal strengths, he couldn't take any decisions independently. Do we need a PM who can not take any strong decision independently? -Shivakumar Hi Pratap,
Good aritcal. One should think about MM Singh and LK Advani before voting.
Everyone knows that, though MM Singh is brilliant and has good personal strengths, he couldn’t take any decisions independently.
Do we need a PM who can not take any strong decision independently?
-Shivakumar

]]> By: Gururaj Vasudevamurthy http://pratapsimha.com/2009/04/10/advani/comment-page-1/#comment-1901 Gururaj Vasudevamurthy Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:31:57 +0000 http://pratapsimha.com/?p=118#comment-1901 This is a reaction to the above comment made by Dr.Gururaj. Of course the article is one sided that is 'right' sided..(To be understood as 'not on the wrong side'), What is the problem in being so..., Being and reacting neutral is neither the real essence of constructive journalism nor the expectation from it by the soceity. Please do understand that even the so called pseudo secular news agencies or journalists are also not neutral. Do you think they are constructive (which mislead the people and soceity) ? For such kind of journalism why don't you tell 'onesided'..? Afterall what ever Pratap has written on Advani or Manmohan are the facts which are to be accepted by you or anybody. About the article : GvÀÛªÀĪÁzÀ ZÀÄgÀÄPÁzÀ ‘G¦à£ÀPÁÄ’ ¯ÉÃR£À. 0iÀiÁªÀ PÁ0UÉæùìUÀgÀÄ ¸ÁªÁ®£ÀÄß ¹éÃPÀj¸À®Æ E®è. ¸Àj0iÀiÁV GvÀÛj¸À®Æ E®è..... ? ºÉÃUÉ vÁ£É DUÀÄvÉÛ..? This is a reaction to the above comment made by Dr.Gururaj.

Of course the article is one sided that is ‘right’ sided..(To be understood as ‘not on the wrong side’), What is the problem in being so…, Being and reacting neutral is neither the real essence of constructive journalism nor the expectation from it by the soceity. Please do understand that even the so called pseudo secular news agencies or journalists are also not neutral. Do you think they are constructive (which mislead the people and soceity) ? For such kind of journalism why don’t you tell ‘onesided’..?
Afterall what ever Pratap has written on Advani or Manmohan are the facts which are to be accepted by you or anybody.
About the article :
GvÀÛªÀĪÁzÀ ZÀÄgÀÄPÁzÀ ‘G¦à£ÀPÁÄ’ ¯ÉÃR£À. 0iÀiÁªÀ PÁ0UÉæùìUÀgÀÄ ¸ÁªÁ®£ÀÄß ¹éÃPÀj¸À®Æ E®è. ¸Àj0iÀiÁV GvÀÛj¸À®Æ E®è….. ? ºÉÃUÉ vÁ£É DUÀÄvÉÛ..?

]]>